Entries from June 2018 ↓

Oprah, Janet Jackson Movie: What Ever Happened To It?

Janet Jackson Oprah

(Getty Images)

Oprah and Janet Jackson had plans to shoot a movie together, claimed an article from one year ago today. At the time, Gossip Cop reported it was a complete fabrication. Now that a full 365 days have passed, it’s clear once again our fact-checking was right, and the National Enquirer’s story, which was picked up and shared by other outlets, was a work of fiction.

On June 10, 2017, the supermarket tabloid maintained Jackson wanted to team up with Oprah because she felt her niece Paris was hogging all the family’s “headlines.” The magazine asserted the singer was “secretly plotting” with the media mogul to give Michael’s daughter “a run for her money” and be the one and only Jackson topping the box office. An unnamed “source” alleged Jackson was so “itching to get back onto the big screen” that she was “huddling round-the-clock with Oprah,” who the outlet contended was “dying to produce her comeback.” The publication’s same untraceable and seemingly concocted “source” added that Jackson wasn’t only “determined to act,” but that she was also “aiming for an Oscar… And with Oprah in her corner, anything’s possible.”

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1526939461036-0’); });

So, what kind of film were they planning? What was the plot? Who else was slated to star in it? Of course, the tabloid didn’t offer any details because the truth was there never was a film Oprah and Jackson were collaborating on. It was all made up by the tabloid.

And, as we noted 12 months ago, it seemed a little odd that that magazine claimed Jackson was going to give her niece a “run for the money” at theaters. To date, Paris’s credits are basically four appearances on the Fox series “Star,” and a small part in the film Gringo. Additionally, the singer herself has only done a handful of movies over the past 25 years. Jackson’s few major film credits include the 1993 film Poetic Justice, Nutty Profession II: The Klumps in 2000, and Tyler Perry’s 2010 movie For Colored Girls.

Curiously, the article was from the same tabloid that ran a cover story about how Jackson “hates” Oprah’s “guts” for interviewing Paris and her brothers Prince and Blanket after Michael Jackson’s death. The magazine alleged at the time that it somehow knew of a supposed “blistering blowup” phone call in which a “furious” Jackson lashed out at Oprah and allegedly told her, “You make me sick.” We’re still not sure how the publication went from that to having the talk show host trying to win Jackson an Oscar.

Regardless, Oprah’s rep, who was speaking on her behalf, exclusively told Gossip Cop that the outlet’s tale was “untrue.” A full year has passed, and it’s clear the tabloid’s unidentifiable source’s claim was phony. There was no talk of a Jackson film with Oprah’s involvement back then, nor is there any today.

We bring up these articles to remind our readers that the truth always bears out over time. And though we’re not infallible, while other outlets almost always hide behind unnamed insiders, our sources often publicly put themselves on the line to correct phony stories about themselves or the celebrities for whom they’re authorized to speak. As a result of our research, access, and dedication to the truth, it should have been obvious to readers then and all the more so now that the Enquirer’s story about Oprah and Jackson “plotting” to work on a film together was fiction, while Gossip Cop‘s report was grounded in facts.

Kris Jenner Comments On Khloé Kardashian’s Relationship With Tristan Thompson: ‘I Really Trust Khloé… She’ll Figure It Out’

The cheating news may be weeks old now, but Khloé Kardashian and Tristan Thompson — and everyone in their immediate circles around them — are still trying to figure out the lay of the land for the new parents.

Kris Jenner, for one, spoke out in full support of Khlo-money this weekend, sharing her thoughts about daughter True Thompson and the NBA star’s cheating ways while out and about at a fashion show on Friday afternoon in Burbank, California.

Related: The Kardashian Family Feud Episode Looks Like It’ll Be Funny!

Talking to the media about everything that’s been going on with Khlo and Tristan, Kris said (below):

“Tristan’s, yeah, he’s great. I think you just have to be there for your kid and follow their lead. I’m not in that relationship or in that situation, so I really trust Khloe. She’s so smart and such a great girl and she’ll figure it out.”

And she added more, all about True (below):

“When [Khloe] comes back [to Los Angeles] I’ll be thrilled! Of course. I miss her…I need to get my hands on that little True. But I’ve been there a couple times getting my fill, and we FaceTime every day so it’s a lot of fun.”

Awww!! That’s cute.

What do y’all think about it, Perezcious readers!? Do U trust Khlo to make the right decisions???

Let us know in the comments (below)…

[Image via Nicky Nelson/Derrick Salters/WENN.]

Kourtney Kardashian Is Being Mommy-Shamed Over Not Waxing Mason Disick’s Eyebrows…

Seriously, people, LEAVE THE KID ALONE!

Kourtney Kardashian (and, to a lesser extent, baby daddy Scott Disick) is currently being mommy-shamed over her son Mason Disick‘s eyebrows after Scott posted a picture of the eight-year-old to his Instagram account late last week.

Related: Kris Jenner Has Her Fam’s Back!!

It all started with this adorable photo, posted to Scott’s IG account (below) which only recently has started to draw a TON of attention over the supposed uni-brow:

My lifeA post shared by Scott Disick (@letthelordbewithyou) on May 28, 2018 at 3:42pm PDT

Awww!!!

That’s a super cute pic!!!

But the comments around it over the past week have been BRUTAL!!!

One user wrote, “I really need Kourtney to do something about Mason’s hair and eyebrows,” while another added “How you gonna let a kid walk around with that unibrow?”

Other users wrote things like, “you have how much money and you can’t help your kid’s unibrow? lol,” and “How you gonna let your son walk around with a brow like that but mama’s ass and tittys and everything about her is always looking good?”

Hmmm… Not great, y’all. Two takeaways:

STOP mommy shaming… and LEAVE MASON ALONE!

That’s all. Thanks!!!

[Image via Ivan Nikolov/WENN.]

Did Angelina Jolie Adopt More Kids?

Angelina Jolie Adopt More Kids

(Getty Images)

Angelina Jolie has not adopted more kids, despite a report a year ago that falsely claimed she was adding more children to her family of six. Gossip Cop busted the story 365 days ago. Now the passage of time has shown our reporting was correct.

On June 9, 2017, we called out the National Enquirer for wrongly claiming Jolie was giving estranged husband Brad Pitt the “ultimate brush-off” by “expanding her brood without him.” The narrative was concocted after the Oscar winner and some of her kids were seen with “several unidentified children of Asian descent” at the La Brea Tar Pits. The outing led the supermarket tabloid to speculate that she planned to “grow her family without Brad.”

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1526939461036-0’); });

“Angie’s moving on with her life, and she’s encouraging the kids to do the same,” a so-called “insider” was quoted as saying. But the magazine had no proof that Jolie was indeed adopting again, and it only jumped to that conclusion, somewhat offensively, because she was seen with “children of Asian descent.” This was an inaccurate assumption.

As Gossip Cop pointed out back then, and as widely reported by reputable media outlets, the children with Jolie were daughter Shiloh’s friends from Cambodia, who came to America to help her celebrate her 11th birthday. The tween wanted to show her pals different aspects of American life, which included not just the trip to the La Brea Tar Pits, but also a visit to Disneyland. This wasn’t a permanent move or a sign that they were officially joining the Jolie family. It was simply a U.S. vacation.

Significantly, Jolie hasn’t been seen with the group of Cambodian kids since then, which is evidence that she didn’t adopt them. In the last 365 days, she hasn’t adopted any other children, either. The star is still just a mom to three girls and three boys, and all six kids are currently with Jolie as she films Maleficent 2 in London. And while it’s certainly possible she could decide to add to their family in the future, particularly once her divorce from Pitt is finalized, it’s abundantly clear the National Enquirer was entirely wrong when it claimed Jolie was adopting a year ago.

Of course, that’s not the only misinformation the tabloid has spread about the actress over the last year. This past September, for example, the magazine laughably claimed Jolie was wearing a special ring in hopes of getting Pitt’s attention and winning him back, even though she was the one who filed for divorce in the first place. As we were told then, the story was “nonsense,” and that’s still the case today. Neither Pitt nor Jolie has any interest in reconciling, which is why they’re still negotiating a divorce settlement. It’s obvious the outlet’s reporting doesn’t reconcile with the facts.

Meghan Markle Buying Home In Malibu?

Meghan Markle Malibu House

(Getty Images)

Is Meghan Markle buying a home in Malibu even though she’s now living in the UK? That’s the premise of a tabloid story. But Gossip Cop can bust it, just as we did other recent untrue rumors about Markle and Prince Harry moving to California.

It was actually back in May of 2017 that Gossip Cop first debunked claims, courtesy of OK!, that Prince Harry and Markle were house-hunting in America, months before they were even engaged. More recently, this past April, New Idea falsely alleged Prince Harry and Markle bought a beach house in Malibu. Then a week later, Star wrongly announced in a cover story that Prince Harry and Markle were “moving to Malibu.”

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1526939461036-0’); });

Now Grazia is offering its own version of this baseless narrative. According to the tabloid, Markle “still holds a special place in her heart for her native state of California and has been house-hunting for a Malibu-based property for herself and Prince Harry.” Interestingly, this is a slight departure from the previous two tales, which contended it was Prince Harry who was searching for a residence for his new bride. But here, the initiative is put on Markle.

“It seems Meghan doesn’t want to cut all ties with where she grew up,” a so-called “Hollywood source” is quoted as saying. The magazine’s supposed snitch continues, “She’s still super-close to her mother, Doria, who lives in L.A., and she has many friends there still, so it makes sense that she’s been investigating buying property there.” It “makes sense” Markle would buy property roughly 60 to 90 minutes, pending traffic, outside of Los Angeles? Hardly.

To add credence to its article, the outlet notes, “Indeed, a number of U.S. publications last month reported the couple were interested in purchasing property in Malibu.” Of course, what the tabloid doesn’t mention is that those stories were debunked. And though the alleged tipster contends “there’s a lot of talk in Malibu real-estate circles about which house the royal couple will purchase,” no reputable realty-focused publication has reported anything about the newlyweds putting down roots in the United States at all.

That’s even more significant considering royal residences tend to get a lot of media coverage. For example, last month it was widely reported that Prince Harry and Markle are renting a new home in Cotswold for weekends in the UK countryside. They primarily live in Nottingham Cottage at Kensington Palace in London, and it’s likely Queen Elizabeth will also gift the pair one of her residences at Sandringham, just as she did for Kate Middleton and Prince William.

But nothing legitimate has been said about a home in California. And, as Gossip Cop has already pointed out in our prior busts, in Markle’s quest to become a UK citizen, she has to meet a residency requirement, which stipulates she cannot spend more than 270 days outside of the region in the three years prior to her application. Given that Markle will already have to travel internationally for her royal duties, it’s implausible to claim she will further spend time away by living in Malibu.

To recap, there have been a series of false stories about Markle and Prince Harry residing in Malibu. In a telltale sign that this newest one shouldn’t be trusted, Grazia tries to use those debunked reports as evidence. In actuality, it has no real proof to substantiate this storyline. Meanwhile, no reputable outlet has reported anything about a Malibu move, while there’s been reliable coverage of their other living arrangements. Lastly, it makes little sense to claim Markle wants a house in Malibu to keep her ties to Los Angeles, and the claim makes even less sense when you consider she’s currently dealing with a UK residency requirement for citizenship. It should be apparent this tale is as bogus as the ones that came before it.

Anthony Bourdain’s Final Days Become More Clear — Photos Surface Of Final Tandem Bike Ride TV Segment Filmed In France For Parts Unknown

We’re starting to learn more about Anthony Bourdain‘s final days, and an image has surfaced that appears to be one of the final pictures ever captured — if not the final one — of Bourdain, taken just a day or two before he ultimately died from an apparent suicide.

The picture, posted earlier this week to Instagram, shows Bourdain riding a tandem bicycle with friend and fellow chef Eric Ripert during a filming day for his show Parts Unknown.

Related: Asia Argento Releases Statement On Anthony’s Tragic Passing

The show’s crew can be seen in their own tandem bicycle alongside, filming as Eric (at the front of the bike) and Anthony (behind him) ride on along in the town of Colmar, in eastern France (below):

Rolling like a kid in #alsace Having fun with the #osmo and #anthonybourdain on #partsunknown #lifeontheroad #bikedate ?: @romerockerA post shared by Todd Liebler (@toddliebler) on Jun 6, 2018 at 10:57am PDT

Just two days after this light-hearted, fun-seeming moment, as we previously reported, it was Ripert who found Bourdain dead in his hotel room.

That location is not even an hour away from where this bike ride went down, BTW.

So sad.

R.I.P., Anthony.

[Image via WENN.]

ICYMI: Drake’s Dad Weighed In On The Rap Beef With Pusha T, And His Quote About It Is AMAZING!

Drake‘s dad is… well, he’s sure something, all right!

The very public rap feud between the Canadian former DeGrassi star and Pusha T has raged on around us for a few weeks now, and while Kanye West himself has publicly called for an end to the feud, Drake may not be done yet.

Related: Scott Disick Goes Back To His Old Ways… Kinda…

Regardless, Drake’s dad, Dennis Graham, has his own HIGHlarious thoughts about the rap battle — and he’s not afraid to share them!

ICYMI, when TMZ caught up with Dennis earlier this week on the street of West Hollywood, the proud papa said the most ridiculous thing about the rap feud between the two artists, telling the paparazzi media outlet (below):

“I don’t know Pusha-T. I don’t know anything about anybody named Pusha-T. If I did, I would push their T.”

We… uh… what the fuck? What does that even mean?! LOLz!!

It’s the perfect dad response to a rap feud… nonsensical, but also cute; hilarious, but also strange. We don’t know what it’d mean to push somebody’s T!!! Does anybody?!

Full vide of that little interchange can be seen below, FYI:

LOLz!!

What a world we live in…

[Image via WENN.]

Gwen Stefani Retiring After Las Vegas Residency?

Gwen Stefani Retiring

(Getty Images)

Is Gwen Stefani’s Las Vegas residency also doubling as her farewell concerts? A new report claims she plans on retiring after the Sin City showcase. Gossip Cop, however, can bust the story.

“Gwen’s Ready To Retire,” announces a headline in the latest edition of Life & Style. With the first show of her “Just A Girl” residency set for later this month, the tabloid alleges the concert will mark “the beginning of the end of her musical career.” A so-called “insider” is quoted as saying, “She’s taking an honest look at her life and what’s important, and she sees the end coming very soon.” Well, it can’t come that soon since Stefani’s residency has dates scheduled through March of 2019.

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1526939461036-0’); });

Still, the suppose source maintains, “Gwen sees her Vegas residency as her last stop.” The outlet then refers to a recent interview in which Stefani said her Las Vegas stint is “perfect for where I’m at right now.” She confessed during the chat, “I’m obviously at the end of my journey of being a musician,” blaming her age and that she’s “been doing it for thirty something years.” But at no point in the lengthy discussion did Stefani say anything about the residency marking the final output of her career.

It seems the publication just cherry-picked parts of the interview, and is sensationally using those quotes to peddle this narrative about Stefani retiring. The tabloid attributes her purported decision to leave the music business to “focusing on family life,” but her kids have always been her priority. In fact, she explains in the interview that the residency allows her flexibility. Indeed, the concerts are scheduled around her sons’ schooling. The first batch of shows coincide with the summer break, then the December holiday break, followed by the March spring break.

It’s also telling that while the magazine’s “insider” contends the singer is “reassessing things as she approaches 50,” the article makes no mention of Stefani and Blake Shelton having a wedding and a baby. Only two months ago, the outlet insisted they would be tying the knot “this summer,” and even claimed that she may already be pregnant. If Stefani was retiring, one would think those major life events would be the reasons why. Yet nothing is said about marriage or having another kid in this latest story.

One of the few things the old and new articles have in common is that they’re both based on comments from an untraceable and unidentifiable “insider.” In contrast, Gossip Cop didn’t hide beyond an anonymous source to debunk the wedding-and-baby narrative, and we don’t need to now, either. A rep for Stefani exclusively tells Gossip Cop on the record that it’s “untrue” she’s planning to retire following the Vegas residency. And it can’t be understated that these questionable retirement claims are coming from a tabloid with a poor track record, as opposed to a trusted music-focused publication, such as Rolling Stone, Billboard or Entertainment Weekly.

Brad Pitt Did NOT “Break Divorce Deal” With Angelia Jolie To Introduce “New Love” Neri Oxman To Kids, Despite Report

Brad Pitt Divorce Deal Angelina Jolie Neri Oxman

(Getty Images)

Brad Pitt did not “break” a purported “divorce deal” to introduce his supposed “new love” to his kids, despite a report. Gossip Cop actually already debunked a version of this false story when it appeared in a tabloid, but now it’s being presented online slightly differently to dupe readers again. We can bust it once more.

According to the National Enquirer’s website, Pitt “craftily flouted an agreement [with] soon-to-be-ex Angelina Jolie” by “using a FaceTime session to introduce his new love Neri Oxman to their kids.” It’s not said when this “digital meet-up” took place, but the gossip magazine claims Pitt and Oxman “were together in Cambridge, Mass.” when she met his children through a video chat. The outlet does not explain how this “breaks” a “divorce deal,” particularly considering Pitt and Jolie have yet to reach a “deal” in their divorce.

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1526939461036-0’); });

But upon learning Oxman had allegedly been introduced to her brood via FaceTime, Jolie’s “reaction was nothing short of volcanic,” contends the publication. A so-called “source” is quoted as saying, “Angie’s livid that Brad’s brought his new lady into their children’s lives.” A second similarly unnamed and untraceable “source” also asserts, “It’s been difficult for Angie to grasp Brad moving on — with Neri, or anyone else.”

When this tale appeared in last week’s print edition of the Enquirer, it was with the headline, “Brad’s Kids Meet His Gal — And Angie Hits The Roof.” Online, the angle is a bit different, with the tabloid’s site declaring, “Brad Breaks Divorce Deal To Introduce New Love To The Kids.” But the bottom line remains the same: None of this is true. There is no evidence that Pitt and Jolie have a “deal” that bars them from introducing significant others to their children, but regardless, Oxman is not the actor’s “new love” and has no reason to meet his kids.

As first accurately reported by Page Six back in April, Pitt and the MIT professor share a “friendship” that “has not turned into romance.” It makes little sense then to claim she’d be FaceTiming with his family, particularly when you consider that “Entertainment Tonight” has already reported that with Pitt’s ongoing split from Jolie, he is “in no way ready to get serious with anyone.” Generally, meeting the kids is typically viewed as a “serious” move in the dating world.

And while the magazine maintains this alleged chat between his children and Oxman took place while the star was in Massachusetts, Pitt hasn’t been spotted at MIT since his visit last fall. There’s been multiple sightings of him in Los Angeles in recent weeks, including on Thursday, when Pitt was seen arriving at a table read for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, which he’ll be filming in L.A. this summer.

Conclusion: When the National Enquirer first peddled this narrative in its magazine, the focus was on Jolie being angry Oxman met her kids. Now online, the premise is Pitt broke a “divorce deal,” for which no details are provided, by introducing the scholar to their children. In both cases, the outlet tellingly cannot provide a date for this introduction, and Pitt has not been seen in Massachusetts since last year. And given that he and Oxman aren’t dating, it makes little sense to allege he introduced her to his family, and makes even less sense to claim Jolie is upset about a nonexistent romance and an equally nonexistent meeting. A little over a week has passed between the print and digital versions of this storyline, yet the publication still cannot provide any evidence to substantiate its contentions, while there’s considerable proof to disprove them. As such, Gossip Cop is rating this story a zero, just like the previous one.

Kim Kardashian Speaks To Van Jones About The Presidential Pardon Of Alice Marie Johnson — WATCH!

Kim Kardashian in her own words…

As we reported, Donald Trump granted Alice Marie Johnson clemency after he met with the KUWTK star, who has publicly pleaded the 63-year-old’s case.

Related: Donald Trump Forgot The Words To God Bless America!

On Wednesday, after 22 years behind bars, the grandmother — who was originally sentenced to life without parole for drug trafficking — was finally released.

On Friday, in an interview with CNN‘s Van Jones, Kanye West‘s wife opens up about her role in securing the presidential pardon for Johnson.

When asked how her meeting with the President came about, the 37-year-old explained:

“When I initially called Ivanka [Trump], I said I would love a meeting with your dad. I said that from the start. Then that took about six or seven months to get… Schedules were changing, and they had rescheduled the meeting and it happened to be on Alice’s birthday… This is just all aligned… I just feel this is the right day to do it.”

Despite being (arguably) the most famous reality TV star in the world, Kardashian said she was “starstruck” when she saw Trump in the Oval Office.

“I never get starstruck, I was starstruck over the Oval Office.”

When she received the phone call from Donnie about Johnson’s clemency, Kardashian said her “heart was so full.”

“I knew it had to be some news… I was feeling things were looking really positive… Yeah, he called my cell phone… He said that he’s really investigated this case… Everyone had a unanimous… feeling of Alice that she will live a great life… She has done her time… She’s never had any infractions… and she became an ordained minister. She got so many degrees… He felt her heart and he explained that to me… My heart was so full.”

Jones also asked the mother-of-three if she thinks Trump is using her as a political pawn to give him legitimacy. She replied:

“I think Kanye’s already given him legitimacy in that way. I was working on this before… I don’t think I would be used… At the end of the day, he heard me out, we got the job done. What could he really use me for?”

WATCH a clip of the interview at the 1:30 mark (below):

[Image via CNN.]